Learning to Author Text with textual CBR
نویسندگان
چکیده
Textual reuse is an integral part of textual case-based reasoning (TCBR) which deals with solving new problems by reusing previous similar problem-solving experiences documented as text. We investigate the role of text reuse for text authoring applications that involve feedback or review generation. Generally providing feedback in the form of assigning a rating from a likert scale is far easier compared to articulating explanatory feedback as text. When previous feedback generated about the same or similar objects are maintained as cases, there is opportunity for knowledge reuse. In this paper, we show how compositional and transformational adaptation techniques can be applied once sentences in a given case are aligned to relevant structured attribute values. Three text reuse algorithms are introduced and evaluated on a dataset gathered from online Hotel reviews from TripAdvisor. Here cases consists of both structured sub-rating attributes together with textual feedback. Generally, aligned sentences linked to similar sub-rating values are clustered together and prototypical sentences are then extracted to enable reuse across similar authors. Experiments show a close similarity between our proposed texts and actual human edited review text. We also found that problems with variability in vocabulary are best addressed when prototypes are formulated from larger sets of similar sentences in contrast to smaller sets from local neighbourhoods.
منابع مشابه
How Machine Learning can be Beneficial for Textual Case-Based Reasoning
In this paper, we discuss the benefits and limitations of Machine Learning (ML) for Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) in domains where the cases are text documents. In textual CBR, the bottleneck is often indexing new cases. While ML has the potential to help build large case-bases from a small start-up collection by learning to classify texts under the index-terms, we found in experiments with a real...
متن کاملReasoning with Textual Cases
Abstract. This paper presents methods that support automatically finding abstract indexing concepts in textual cases and demonstrates how these cases can be used in an interpretive CBR system to carry out case-based argumentation and prediction from text cases. We implemented and evaluated these methods in SMILE+IBP, which predicts the outcome of legal cases given a textual summary. Our approac...
متن کاملTextual Cbr and Information Retrieval { a Comparison {
In recent years, quite a number of projects started to apply case-based reasoning technology to textual documents instead of highly structured cases. For this the term Textual CBR has been coined. In this paper, we give an overview over the main ideas of Textual CBR and compare it with Information Retrieval techniques. We also present some preliminary results obtained from three projects perfor...
متن کاملProgress in Textual Case-Based Reasoning: Predicting the Outcome of Legal Cases from Text
This paper reports on a project that explored reasoning with textual cases in the context of legal reasoning. The work is anchored in both Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) and AI and Law. It introduces the SMILE+IBP framework that generates a case-based analysis and prediction of the outcome of a legal case given a brief textual summary of the case facts. The focal research question in this work was ...
متن کاملDeveloping Mapping and Evaluation Techniques for Textual Case-Based Reasoning
Textual Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) is not simply Information Retrieval (IR) of text documents which happen also to be cases. Nor does it involve only techniques for automatically determining what cases represented as texts are about or techniques for automatically indexing such cases under relevant features. Textual CBR is still case-based reasoning, and for us, that means drawing inferences ab...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010